BOE Votes 4-3 on 2.86 Percent Spending Increase

Board of Ed restores funding and sends 2012-13 budget to First Selectman.

The Brookfield Board of Education (BOE) approved a proposed $37,185,545 budget that would increase spending by 2.86 percent, add more teachers at the elementary schools through the reallocation of existing positions and some additional funding, while also restoring money for paraprofessionals and remedial reading instructors, which .

“Parents expect us to provide a quality education,” BOE Vice Chairman Jane Miller said Wednesday in voting for the package, which is slightly higher than the 2.76 percent spending hike that .

BOE Chairman Ray DiStephan voted against the package, indicating that he supported another of the four scenarios provided by the administration, which would have only increased spending by 2.74 percent.

However, he said he was comfortable with the adopted plan, noting that it is only $46,000 higher than the plan he supported.

BOE member Harry Shaker said he favored a 2.48 percent spending increase, indicating that to get approved in May at referendum, the budget would need to carry a hike of less than 2.7 percent.

The adopted package was approved 4-3, with Miller, Scott McCarthy, Victor Katz and Paul Checco supporting it and BOE Secretary Susan Queenan, Shaker and DiStephan voting in opposition.

The plan includes an additional kindergarten teacher at (CES), which should lower class sizes to 18 students per teacher as the district starts its next August. There also will be extended time for monitors at CES.

Under the proposal, the school district would add a fourth grade teacher at (HHES) and reallocate a teacher from (WMS) to HHES and restore the two remedial reading teachers that the BOE had considered eliminating.

School administrators have said the additional teachers at HHES should bring the average classroom sizes to the BOE’s guidelines or at least close to meeting that standard.

“Getting the class sizes down at Huckleberry has long been an issue,” DiStephan said.

The BOE also decided to restore the full-time equivalent of 5.67 paraprofessional positions that had been proposed for elimination since federal funds to pay for them will expire in June.

Tim Riddle, the president of the paraprofessionals bargaining unit, told the BOE during public comment that the loss of the 5.67 positions “will have an impact on kids.”

“The paraprofessionals are part of the classroom team,” said Olga Weitzman, who, like Riddle, is a paraprofessional at WMS.

“We are the first line of defense,” she added.

Bivona said the paraprofessionals are “dedicated educators” and that his proposal to eliminate the positions wasn’t “devaluing” them.

He said he was attempting to “balance the budget the best we could.”

Bivona said over the recent years the district had eliminated 14 teaching positions and only seven paraprofessional positions.

DiStephan said in an interview after the meeting that he believed the BOE restored the positions because the members believe “that they impact” students.

Riddle said his members will speak to the Board of Finance (BOF) as it considers the proposed municipal budget this spring.

“We’re going to leave no stone unturned to get it done,” he said.

The BOE’s proposal also includes a maintenance mechanic, a new position that would be responsible for heating and ventilation issues and other maintenance related to the school buildings.

DiStephan has said he believes it would be better to have a staff person address those issues instead of outsourcing the work.

The BOE was able to restore some proposed reductions and keep the spending increase under 2.9 percent by lowering a variety of line items, including coaches, postage and leases on photocopying machines.

The BOE’s proposed budget will be sent by January 31 to First Selectman Bill Davidson, who is expected to present his proposed municipal budget to the Board of Selectmen (BOS) by February 15.

The BOS will then adopt its recommended plan and send it to the BOF by March 1.

DiStephan said the BOE’s proposed 2.86 percent increase is comparable to what several other similar districts are recommending.

“Now we have to let everybody know that we think this is a reasonable budget in regards to the kids and the homeowners,” he said.

Brookfield is undergoing a revaluation of property values, which, generally speaking, have declined as a result of the economic recession.

“I believe that dollars spent on schools have a return to every homeowner,” DiStephan said. “I think it’s a very sound investment.”

Ray DiStephan January 23, 2012 at 03:01 PM
Now if all 30 students were in one grade (they aren’t), then you can see a real cost savings through a teacher reduction and no longer needing to supply that classroom, etc. But this is not the case. I should also point out that the projected reduction in enrollment was off significantly. We ended up with considerably more students than was projected. FACT - The BHS project WAS NOT managed by the BOE or the administration.....the appointed Municipal Building Committee was charged with this task. I appreciate the economic climate and the struggles people are having in our community and country. I think we probably disagree on how we got here and what needs to be done to fix things. But that being said, the BOE tried to come up with a compromise to accommodate all. To some extent, I think the best compromise is one where nobody is completely satisfied with the results. We may have that here.
Ray DiStephan January 23, 2012 at 03:02 PM
As to a 0% increase, we are talking about a $1million dollar reduction in the proposed budget – the vast majority of which is to simply maintain what we currently have. The idea that there would not be significant teacher cuts and significant student impact is simply a pipe dream. Support a 0% if you want to, but don’t fool yourself into believing that the BOE will be able to figure out a way to make it work without significant impact. There will be and I don’t believe that is fair at all. Do I think increases are fair to people who are struggling? In terms of the school budget, if I didn’t believe it was as fair as it can be, I would not be supporting it. Finally, I enjoy these posts and the discussion, but I will not always be able to respond to each quickly. The BOE wants your continued input and you can access all 7 BOE members through our email: brookfieldboe@gmail.com Let’s keep the good discourse going.
Ray DiStephan January 23, 2012 at 03:03 PM
FACT - We have reduced electricity from a high of $788,084 to $570,000 in the 2011-12 budget, a reduction of over $218,000 - a 27.7% reduction, This is due to negotiating better rates through Constellation New Energy (for both the BOE and Town) and the completion of energy efficient lighting projects in all buildings and parking lots. With a rate reduction of 11% effective 6/1//2011, we anticipate further reductions in 2012-13. Regarding Education Energy – The BOE and the administration have never received any communication from anyone regarding this firm. The link is below. While they say they will save 20-30% off our utility bills, it requires the hiring of an Energy Education Specialist to coordinate the program. However, we will investigate further. But we have still controlled our costs exceptionally well. http://www.energyeducation.com/OurServices/tabid/58/Default.aspx
Longtime Brookfield resident January 23, 2012 at 03:25 PM
Ray- Thanks so much your points are well taken and show the work you and the board have put in. Many thanks for ll your efforts and especaily for your responses as you put in the extra work to make these posts. I think we all need to review your responses and if ANYONE has any suggestions for us ALL that may have been over looked or a new way of thinking please post. In the end I would love to see a reduction but will VOTE YES for our children in the end.
Steven DeVaux January 24, 2012 at 01:01 AM
CBC, I think that the impacts being felt by our seniors citizens, our long term unemployed and our under employed should all be shared equally with all municipal functions, both town and education. I don't think the second grade is going for varsity letters and judging from the increased absentee rate, it doesn't appear that the administrators are successfully engaging kids.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »