.
Feedback

Video: Meeting Turnout Fails Salon Ordinance Recall

Too few registered voters attended Thursday's town meeting to hold official vote.

Thursday night’s special town meeting to overturn the new Salon Ordinance failed to garner enough attendance for a vote, as town charter requires at least 1 percent of registered voters to be present and in favor of overruling the action of the Board of Selectmen (BOS) for the meeting to be valid.

Though supporters of holding the town meeting were on the petition to rescind the Salon Ordinance, only 45 electors were present at Thursday’s meeting.

After a brief , meeting moderator Marty Flynn opened the floor up to public comment, with Dr. Sullivan, Town Sanitarian Paul Avery, First Selectman Bill Davidson and Selectman Howard Lasser answering questions. [See video above for more from the Q&A session with the public.]

____________________________________________

Interested in Brookfield news, events, community bulletins, blogs and businesses? Sign up for the free Brookfield Patch daily newsletter, "like" us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Flynn also took a hand vote of the audience to gauge the disposition of those that attended. Only three members of the audience raised their hand in favor of keeping the ordinance, including Davidson and Lasser.

“Overwhelmingly, the people who came out tonight came to overturn the ordinance,” Flynn said before closing the meeting, “But they did not have the votes.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Brookfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steven DeVaux May 19, 2013 at 08:16 am
I would recommend supporting an increase similar to Ridgefield's which was under 2% (1.97%). If aRead More community like Ridgefield can perform at high levels with an increase under 2%, the Board of Education, in asking for almost twice that is openly admitting that they have installed inefficient management in school administration. Further, the sewer system on the referendum will require municipal funding since it is backed by the full faith and credit of the town of Brookfield and reduces the town's borrowing ability - the advertisement for which indicated it would not impact municipal funding.
Steven DeVaux May 19, 2013 at 06:52 am
So Mandarin Chinese won't be a requirement? Perhaps Manchurin Chinese? Cantonese Chinese? MongolianRead More Chinese? Which Chinese are the British speaking these days? Their empire stretched in the Hindu speaking parts of Asia but they aren't teaching Hindu. A quandry indeed.
Steven DeVaux May 17, 2013 at 05:23 pm
The board of education's policy should pertain to all employees of the Brookfield Board ofRead More Education.
Steven DeVaux May 17, 2013 at 05:22 pm
The short answer is because they want to. If you spent twice at much they still would. EducationRead More personnel need to be monitored on social media like Patch.
Laura Orban May 17, 2013 at 12:18 pm
I will lend a hand by voting yes for the school budget this Tuesday, May 21st. Teachers should notRead More have to pay out of pocket for school supplies.
Steven DeVaux May 18, 2013 at 11:58 am
Interesting that representative Scribner fails to represent Brookfield's businesses choosing insteadRead More to focus on Ridgefields.
Jean Hislop May 15, 2013 at 11:24 pm
I am also displeased with the new design. I di not find it mobile friendly, nir easy to navigate.
Lucia May 15, 2013 at 06:50 am
You certainly have a way with words. Why does it "suck"?