.

Buffoon of the Week: I Nominate Todd Akin

When the Republican Congressman said victims of ‘legitimate rape’ don’t get pregnant, he did more than make a political gaffe — he earned the title of Ignorant Misogynist.

Just when you think congressional reputation couldn’t get any lower, along comes Republican Congressman Todd Akin. This legislative ‘genius’ — who has been sent to Washington six times by a segment of the electorate from Missouri, and is now running for Senator in that state — made the following statement during an interview with a local FOX television news station:

It seems to me, first of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape is] really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.

Where do we even begin?!

At the bare minimum, I’m sure I don’t have to explain that, No, the female reproductive anatomy can’t distinguish between forced or consensual intercourse when it comes to conception. Just think how much easier it would be if women who didn’t want to get pregnant could just ‘will’ their bodies to make it go away. Perhaps we should be a wee bit concerned that Rep. Akin sits on the House Science Committee.

In real life, rape actually does result in unwanted pregnancy with “significant frequency.” It’s estimated that more than 32,000 rape-related pregnancies occur each year (which is likely a low estimate, given that rape is often underreported). That was the conclusion from actual scientists and doctors, according to study findings they published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology: 

Rape-related pregnancy is a cause of many unwanted pregnancies and is closely linked with family and domestic violence.

Which leads us to the most reprehensible part of Akin’s statement: using the word legitimate to describe rape. Is he suggesting that some rapes are not legitimate, that the woman somehow really wanted or invited the sexual assault to happen? Perhaps Akin believes there are situations where a woman doesn’t really have the right to say “No.” Is rape only ‘legitimate’ when the victim doesn’t know her attacker? Maybe, for Akin, ‘No Means No,’ except when it doesn’t.

Sure, this is a guy who’s got the best intentions for women’s health. Riiiiight.

Of course, Akin just continued on with the theme of marginalizing the woman whose body has already been abused and assaulted without her consent. In the same interview, he said that even if those ‘natural’ anatomical defenses against unwanted pregnancy somehow fail, abortion should not be a legal option for the rape victim.

“But let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work, or something,” Akin said. “I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child.”

The woman — the actual victim — doesn’t even figure into the equation, according to this champion of how women’s bodies should be regarded. Perhaps Akin believes she should get punished too.

Even though Akin later tried to backtrack somewhat by saying he ‘misspoke,’ it was too late to get that pig back in the barn.

But with the hot glare of media spotlight suddenly shining on the Congressman, it became even clearer that the pig has been out of the barn and rolling in the mud of misogyny for a while.

Early in his political career, Akin questioned an anti-marital-law in Missouri, concerned it might be used by women to "beat up on husbands" in messy divorces. Akin was also a co-sponsor on a 2011 bill in Congress that restricted federal funds for abortions to victims of ‘forcible’ rape, a bill often referred to as the “let Women Die” bill. Seems we’re back to the era of blame the victim:  She was asking for it! It’s her fault, look at how she was dressed! Husbands don’t rape their wives — they’re supposed to have sex. Limited mental ability? 19-year-old victim of incest? Sorry, you’re out of luck.

I like the suggestion made by one writer, that public officials who draft legislation on women’s health be required to first take — and pass — a course in female biology. Perhaps they should also be required to have a vagina.

Of course I know that that last suggestion isn’t the way our government works. Legislators quite frequently have to consider laws about segments of the population from which they differ. However, as a woman, it’s infuriating to think that members of our government want to legislate my control over what happens to my body. Forced vaginal ultrasounds, pregnancy prevention, women’s health coverage — these are all reasonable topics up for discussion and limitation, according to some up on Capitol Hill.

Akin may have stepped waaaaay over the line with this latest ‘mis-speaking’ — thankfully, he’s been slammed by people on all sides of the political spectrum, including even the Romney-Ryan team. Campaign spokesperson Andrea Saul released a statement on Sunday: “Gov. Romney and Congressman Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin’s statement, and a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape.” (What’s interesting is that this differs from past positions that Ryan has previously taken with regard to abortion, birth control and women’s health, even in cases of rape or incest. He even co-sponsored that “forcible rape” law with Akin last year.)

Akin is not alone with his beliefs, and errors like this have the GOP worried their hopes of reclaiming the Senate are getting slimmer. One can only hope that at least the seat Akin is vying for will stay handily in possession of the current occupant, a Democratic Senator — who just happens to be a woman.

So Missouri, you’re the “Show Me State.” On behalf of all women, I’d like to ask you to show Rep. Akin, Patch In’s “Buffoon of the Week” one more thing — the door. 

Margaret Callahan August 21, 2012 at 10:54 AM
Akin is a legitimate buffoon.
Rob Gianazza August 21, 2012 at 05:00 PM
Sorry, the title of buffoon has already been claimed by Joe Biden. I do have to admire how a statement can be taken totally out of context. "Legitimate rape", granted, a very poor choice in wording, refers to any woman that has been raped. "Non-legitimate rape" is reporting a rape only after conception for the purpose of obtaining an abortion in a situation where abortion would normally be outlawed. Just for clarification, my position is that abortion is a very personal choice that the individual must reconcile with his or her God. In other words, the government should not be determining the legality. If doctors choose to perform a service and patients choose to patronize that service, governments only role should be certifications for the purposes of health and safety. "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..."
Aaron Boyd (Editor) August 21, 2012 at 05:05 PM
Hey Rob, **Spoilers** — Check out Patch Back tomorrow for Lisa's Buffoon of the Week.
John Mainhart August 21, 2012 at 05:20 PM
I, for one, think that Mr. Atkin was referrering to women who claim they were raped and really were not. I am sure there is a ,lot of information that we should learn about the statistics cited because the government and other large organizations give us statistical information all the time and they always say that the terrible conclusions they came to are really much worse because ,so much is unreported. This plus the fact that many media people present the information they gtive us and interpret the information in a way that masks the truth makes the truth hard to determine. I support neither party but I do believe that all should ,seek the truth. In pursuance of that goal I offer a story I ,learned about a woman in the Congo area that was taken to the jungle and repeatedly raped with many other women of her village. A reporter asked her how she felt about the siox year old boy ,who was near her and a result of those rapes. She affirmed her love for the boy and stated she didn't know how anyone could blame or punish an innocent for the violence of the people who raped her.
David Propper August 21, 2012 at 10:36 PM
If Mr Atkin was referring to "women who claim that they were raped and really were not", what did he mean by "because the female body has ways to "shut that whole thing down."" Shut what down if nothing actually happened? I find it scary that somebody things that this man was qualified to sit on the House Science Committee. I hope there were no biology issues brought before that body.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »