On Jan. 14,2013 Kevin Opinski and Austin Opinski asked the Candlewood Shores Board in Brookfield, CT to make and to provide a reasonable accommodation to qualified individuals with disabilities for parking on roads, parking at the beach and in front of the house’s. Kevin has asked the board to please be open to the people with differences and as well the elderly people that live among us here in the area. The board said there was no need for them to comply with the federal law’s under the ADA act that’s in place to help those that may need a little more help than others. This law that was made to ensure what normal people can do on their own; the same would be for those with less abilities. So that said, this could just benefit the people in this Candlewood Shores Tax District. However, even when ask to make parking spots at the beach handicap accessible, they respond that it is not their duty to do so or anything till they change the roads or parking lot’s and parking ban’s on the street’s. The meeting could be called everything but helpful to the overall work that should be done in this District and it should be shamed by how they treat people from this great district. It shows a lack of being inconsiderate of others short coming.
However I do remember the day growing up in this community that was so friendly and forgiving. This was the place I went to school and come back to see people here, have lost their morals and the great gift to see all people in the Shores as one of the greatest. Candlewood Shores will always have a place in my life. I truthfully feel if we change how we look at thing’s, then the things we look at will change as well.
I was at the meeting last night January 16, 2013 and wanted to see if the board was willing to make an ADA act accommodation. As far as people that have disabilities? I would like if the Board would let me know, why they felt there was no need for an accommodation? This was a request to have closer parking that would help Austin Opinski as well for Kevin Opinski. I now ask for the board to please tell me the reason that there was not a need for an accommodation made for Austin Opinski and was denied even after asking to give medical records. Please let me know after asking now two times, how it was not even being looked at or given a closer look. ADA Act Title II “II-7.1100 Primary consideration. When an auxiliary aid or service is required, the public entity must provide an opportunity for individuals with disabilities to request the auxiliary aids and services of their choice and must give primary consideration to the choice expressed by the individual. "Primary consideration" means that the public entity must honor the choice, unless it can demonstrate that another equally effective means of communication is available, or that use of the means chosen would result in a fundamental alteration in the service, program, or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens.
You mean Mr. Fletcher lied?
You can request that from the town. They have to do it, and with a paved surface. You won't have to cross Candlewood Road anymore from Cadigan.
However, I do believe personally that all political ideologies have great things to contrast against each other, but in this case, it is about just common courtesy to other human beings as a whole.