.
Feedback

Vote "No" on Charter changes

In Brookfield we are being asked to vote on Charter questions which make substantive changes to our form of government.  All of the changes place more layers of government between us, the average citizen, and the operation of our town.  Supposedly we need five selectmen because of the “complications” of meeting and complying with FOI regulations.  What’s so complicated about filing an agenda in the Town Clerk’s office 24 hours before a meeting, allowing the meeting to be observed and taking minutes?  Those are the “complications” the selectmen want sidestepped.  Brookfield hasn’t always had a stellar record of FOI compliance.  Many fought hard over the years to make our government open and responsive.  Brookfielders have shown that this issue matters to them by overwhelmingly voting against the 5 selectmen board twice already.  Why is this being foisted on us yet again?  As President Johnson said, during the signing ceremony for the Federal FOI Act in 1966, “No one should be able to pull curtains of secrecy around decisions which can be revealed without injury to the public interest."   Why are we being asked to give away our rights and allow secret meetings?  Why are we being asked to raise the threshold of petition signers necessary for calling a town meeting, thereby disenfranchising neighborhoods like Greenridge or Happy Landings neighbors on issues of vital impact on them?  Why would a free people give away their rights this way?  Retain your rights: vote “NO” on all Charter questions in Brookfield.

Kerry Swift

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Brookfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Olga Konyukhova May 20, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Thank you, I will! We all miss him and hope he'll find his way home.
Jaimie Cura (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 11:28 am
Sending all the best vibes your way. I shared your post on Facebook and Twitter. Keep us posted,Read More Olga!
BuckWheat May 19, 2013 at 04:28 pm
Oh dont you worry, were gonna vote, but not going to vote to increase taxes thats for sure. Do withRead More what you have.
Steven DeVaux May 19, 2013 at 08:16 am
I would recommend supporting an increase similar to Ridgefield's which was under 2% (1.97%). If aRead More community like Ridgefield can perform at high levels with an increase under 2%, the Board of Education, in asking for almost twice that is openly admitting that they have installed inefficient management in school administration. Further, the sewer system on the referendum will require municipal funding since it is backed by the full faith and credit of the town of Brookfield and reduces the town's borrowing ability - the advertisement for which indicated it would not impact municipal funding.
Steven DeVaux May 19, 2013 at 06:52 am
So Mandarin Chinese won't be a requirement? Perhaps Manchurin Chinese? Cantonese Chinese? MongolianRead More Chinese? Which Chinese are the British speaking these days? Their empire stretched in the Hindu speaking parts of Asia but they aren't teaching Hindu. A quandry indeed.
Steven DeVaux May 17, 2013 at 05:23 pm
The board of education's policy should pertain to all employees of the Brookfield Board ofRead More Education.
Steven DeVaux May 17, 2013 at 05:22 pm
The short answer is because they want to. If you spent twice at much they still would. EducationRead More personnel need to be monitored on social media like Patch.
Laura Orban May 17, 2013 at 12:18 pm
I will lend a hand by voting yes for the school budget this Tuesday, May 21st. Teachers should notRead More have to pay out of pocket for school supplies.
Steven DeVaux May 18, 2013 at 11:58 am
Interesting that representative Scribner fails to represent Brookfield's businesses choosing insteadRead More to focus on Ridgefields.