Nazi Weapons Act of 1938

Donald Borsch Jr. February 7, 2013 at 02:22 pm

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler
http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/id14.html

Amy Lynn February 8, 2013 at 07:41 pm

Yesterday at the Democrat retreat in Virginia, Joe Biden said, It is clearly within the right of the government to determine what type of weapons can be owned by the public."
Let's review the Nazi Weapons Act.....Which number is that on the list ? Keep the 7 point list handy and whenever the gun grabbers speak....you can match up what they say and Adolf Hitler's list.

Donald Borsch Jr. February 8, 2013 at 08:14 pm

Sure, sure, you can have any gun you want. As long as we say so.
You can have any gun you want. As long as we like it. You can have any gun you want. As long as it doesn't scare me.

Lucia February 8, 2013 at 08:29 pm

Heil obama!

Wondering February 8, 2013 at 10:39 pm

Didn't Reagan support the Assault Rifle ban?

Donald Borsch Jr. February 8, 2013 at 11:52 pm

Wondering,
Indeed he did. And that was "assault weapons", not semi-automatic AR15's or the like. Big difference.

Amy Lynn February 9, 2013 at 01:57 pm

The Democrat Gun-Grabbers were at it again in California yesterday.
Let's pull out our handy Nazi Gun Control list and see how many points they can get. (3). The law gives (Democrat) officials unrestricted power to decide what kinds of firearms (in this case semiautomatic rifles with clips) could, or could not be owned by the public. (4). The gives (Democrat) officials unrestricted power to decide what type of ammo was legal. (2). They even want back ground checks for ammo purchases. They even want background checks for every person who lives in the house where the gun is. (6). Some exceptions for "sporting/hunting" purposes. California already has Nazi Gun Rule #1 and # 5. Go California ! Six out of 7 of Adolf Hitler's Gun Control list ! The only point missing is # 7...Nazi Party Members are exempted from the Gun Control Rules. Come on California.....You can do it ! Let's get all 7 of Adolf Hitler's Gun Control Laws !

Steven DeVaux February 10, 2013 at 02:25 pm

The socialist democrats appear to be the emerging America's fascist pary in disguise. Fascism recognizes the occurrence of class conflict, and advocates a resolution to end the division of classes within a nation and secure national solidarity.However fascism publicly favours proletarian culture due to its association of proletarian culture with economic production and claims that the proletariat as producers must have a dominant role in the nation. It rejects standard bourgeois culture that it associates with unfit sedentary lifestyle, individualism, plutocracy, and the bourgeoisie's economic exploitation of the nation's proletariat, that fascism views as inconsistent with virile nationhood. Fascism claims that cultural nationalization of society emancipates the nation's proletariat, and promotes the assimilation of all classes into a proletarian nation.
Fascism advocates a state-controlled and regulated mixed economy; the principal economic goal of fascism is to achieve autarky to secure national self-sufficiency and independence, through protectionist and interventionist economic policies. It promotes regulated private enterprise and private property contingent whenever beneficial to the nation and state enterprise and state property whenever necessary to protect its interests.

Wondering February 10, 2013 at 09:45 pm

But he did support a ban on certain forms of arms. The Great Ronald Reagan did that.

Ryen February 10, 2013 at 10:15 pm

Heil Obama!

Ryen February 10, 2013 at 10:16 pm

Extreme Socialism leads to Fascism: FDR -> LBJ -> Obama -> Hitler???

Donald Borsch Jr. February 10, 2013 at 10:44 pm

Wondering,
Yes. On full-automatic firearms. Those are indeed 'assault weapons'. Feinstein and her ilk wish to ban semi-automatic firearms. Not the same thing that Reagan disliked.

Steven DeVaux February 11, 2013 at 01:55 pm

Don't kid yourself. Just look around you.

Donald Borsch Jr. February 11, 2013 at 02:25 pm

1. Control the media...check.
2. Cripple the economy...check. 3. Foment governmental dependency of the weak-minded...check. 4. Disarm the populace...soon. The New America Agenda 2013.

Wondering February 11, 2013 at 03:11 pm

How would handle the conversion kits that gives a semi-automatic AR-15 the rapid fire capabilities of (or at least very close to) a fully-automatic weapon? Would you ban the conversion kits?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U6tORrODJE

Donald Borsch Jr. February 11, 2013 at 03:31 pm

Wondering,
You mean this, as in bump fire capability: http://militarygunsupply.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=57&products_id=1082 Would I ban this? Wondering, I wouldn't ban any guns. I would augment the laws regarding punishment for the use of guns for ill to life in prison level, period.

Donald Borsch Jr. February 11, 2013 at 08:36 pm

Gun control not a public priority, despite what the ant-gun crowd says. Ooops. Those pesky facts.
http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/

janice borkenhagen February 20, 2013 at 09:59 am

The intent of the Second Amendment has ALWAYS been to protect citizens from a tyrannical government. Our right to keep and bear arms does not come to us UNDER the 2nd Amendment. The 2nd Amendment RESTRICTS the government from infringing on our inalienable, natural right to keep and bear arms. The Bill of Rights does not give us any rights whatsoever, but what it does do is plainly state what natural birthrights we have that our government is restricted from attacking.

Steven DeVaux February 20, 2013 at 10:04 am

Wow. Absolutely true.

Edmund Burke February 20, 2013 at 02:39 pm

Janice,
Exactly!